Your first lead is your cheapest lead, and your last lead is your most expensive lead. This principal is vital if you want to reduce wasted marketing spend.
Most business owners don’t understand this simple truth about marketing economics. They think if they can get one lead for £10, they can get ten leads for £100. But that’s not how it works.
If you can have one lead for £10, you probably can’t get two for £20. It would probably be closer to £22 for two, three for £35, five leads for £60, and it tends to deteriorate the further you go up. It’s a sliding scale, not a linear progression.
This fundamental principle shapes everything about how digital marketing actually works, yet most agencies would rather you didn’t know about it.
When you start marketing in any channel, you’re going after the easiest opportunities first. You’re targeting the people most likely to convert, using the keywords with the best combination of search volume and low competition, reaching the audience segments that are actively looking for what you offer.
But once you’ve exhausted those opportunities, the next lead becomes harder to acquire. And the one after that, harder still. All of a sudden, you’re overbidding and looking to reduce wasted marketing spend.
Take Google Ads as an example. When you first start bidding on keywords, you might target specific, less competitive terms that directly relate to your business. But as you scale up your spend, you’re forced to bid on more obvious keywords where competition is fierce. The most obvious terms that link really strongly to your business are super competitive, and you’re not actually going to be able to rank for them without spending significantly more.
You have a lot of situations where a client has tried it themselves and thrown a thousand quid at Google and it’s gone, and they have absolutely no idea what happened. All they know is their money’s gone and Google said thank you very much.
Those thousand pounds get fragmented across multiple channels and keywords, diluted to the point where they can’t make a meaningful impact anywhere. The budget that seemed substantial suddenly becomes insufficient to compete effectively.
The economics get even more challenging when you’re a smaller business competing against larger players. If you turn over a million in a certain space and you’re bidding on keywords that your competitors who are top of the space are bidding on, they’re turning over 20 million and they’re bidding on those same keywords. That’s not a sustainable way to reduce wasted marketing spend.
Your competitors with bigger budgets can afford to pay more per click because their larger operation allows them to extract more value from each customer. They’ve got economies of scale working in their favour. You’re fighting a losing battle trying to outbid them on the most obvious, competitive terms.
The smarter approach is finding keywords that are more niche or specific to you, which still have the traffic, but not just picking the most obvious keywords you think of straight away. It’s important to know what your goals are as a business. Find some slightly more targeted keywords, bid on those and grow a bit, because otherwise you waste your whole marketing budget, don’t grow, and just get flushed out by your competitors again.
Here’s an uncomfortable truth about the agency business model. Most people, if they get a channel of marketing activity that really works for them, one of the things they often do is just scale it and say, well okay, if I spend ten times the amount on that, I’m going to get ten times the results.
And it doesn’t happen.
Agencies know this. But many won’t tell you because clients benefit from small and often, whilst agencies benefit from big and infrequent. The incentives are misaligned, especially if you’re trying to reduce wasted marketing spend.
When you commit to a large budget upfront, the agency gets its revenue locked in. Whether that budget delivers proportional results or not becomes almost secondary. They optimise for their own revenue model rather than your actual returns.
This is why bulk discounting in agency services often works against the client’s best interests. Yes, you might get a discount for committing to a larger contract, but if that larger spend doesn’t deliver proportionally better results because of the non-linear economics we’ve just discussed, you’ve actually made your situation worse, not better.
Understanding the non-linear economics of marketing acquisition should fundamentally change how you approach growth and your strategy to reduce wasted marketing spend.
First, it means you need to test and learn before scaling. Don’t assume that what works at £1,000 a month will work at £10,000 a month. The dynamics change completely as you scale up or reduce wasted marketing spend.
Second, it means you need genuine expertise to identify where the opportunities are. Finding those less competitive keywords, those underserved audience segments, those emerging channels where costs haven’t been bid up yet requires skill and experience. This is where having someone who actually knows what they’re doing becomes essential.
Third, it means you need transparent reporting that shows you the actual cost per lead at different spending levels, not just aggregate numbers that hide the deteriorating economics as you scale.
Fourth, it means you should be deeply sceptical of agencies that push you to dramatically increase budgets without demonstrating that the economics still work at that level. If they can’t show you that your tenth lead will cost roughly the same as your fifth lead, you’re probably about to waste money. We recommend first asking these questions if you want to reduce wasted marketing spend.
This principle doesn’t just apply to lead generation. It applies to customer acquisition as well.
With previous clients, we’ve seen that the first purchase is often the cheapest. In fact, sometimes you’re even losing money on that first purchase. But if you have the data on how many times people order on average, whether their second orders are usually bigger, their third orders usually bigger, and you know what type of customer and where they’re from, orders the most, you can make that initial acquisition cost make sense.
This is why having someone handle your marketing, your CRM, and your website together is so valuable. They can give you that actionable data throughout the process. If you’ve got lots of agencies working on different bits, they’re all going to possibly blame each other for why this metric is less or why this is more.
The reality is that marketing doesn’t scale linearly, and it never will. Your first leads are your cheapest leads and your last leads are your most expensive leads. This is just the economics of how markets work.
But knowing this allows you to make smarter decisions. It allows you to question agency recommendations. It allows you to understand why those thousand pounds disappeared without a trace. It allows you to test at smaller scales before committing to larger budgets. It allows you to recognise when you’re hitting diminishing returns and need to look at different channels or approaches.
Most importantly, it allows you to work with agencies that are willing to have honest conversations about these realities rather than those who obscure them to maximise their own revenue.
The best marketing strategy isn’t about spending more. It’s about spending smarter, understanding the economics, and working with partners who’ll tell you the truth even when it’s not in their immediate financial interest to do so. It takes two to effectively reduce wasted marketing spend, so choose wisely.
If you want to reduce wasted marketing spend, you need to first gauge if the marketing spend is actually wasted. Do this by finding your cost per conversion. And always remember, your first lead is your cheapest lead!
There is only so much you can tell from our website. Find your marketing solution through a short call with the team.
Book A Call